- This topic has 2 voices and 2 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2006 at 1:37 am #2360
Has this been discussed before? Very odd topic, but worth mentioning I think.
“Earwax comes in two types, wet and dry. The wet form predominates in Africa and Europe, where 97 percent or more of people have it, and the dry form among East Asians. The populations of South and Central Asia are roughly half and half. By comparing the DNA of Japanese with each type, the researchers were able to identify the gene that controls which type a person has, they report in today’s issue of Nature Genetics.
They then found that the switch of a single DNA unit in the gene determines whether a person has wet or dry earwax. The gene’s role seems to be to export substances out of the cells that secrete earwax. The single DNA change deactivates the gene and, without its contribution, a person has dry earwax.
The Japanese researchers, led by Kohichiro Yoshiura of Nagasaki University, then studied the gene in 33 ethnic groups around the world. Since the wet form is so common in Africa and in Europe, this was likely to have been the ancestral form before modern humans left Africa 50,000 years ago.
The dry form, the researchers say, presumably arose later in northern Asia, because they detected it almost universally in their tests of northern Han Chinese and Koreans. The dry form becomes less common in southern Asia, probably because the northerners with the dry earwax gene intermarried with southern Asians carrying the default wet earwax gene. The dry form is quite common in Native Americans, confirming other genetic evidence that their ancestors migrated across the Bering Strait from Siberia 15,000 years ago.
*****
But earwax seems to have the very humble role of being no more than biological flypaper, preventing dust and insects from entering the ear. Since it seems unlikely that having wet or dry earwax could have made much difference to an individual’s fitness, the earwax gene may have some other, more important function. Dr. Yoshiura and his colleagues suggest that the gene would have been favored because of its role in sweating. “
May 23, 2006 at 1:37 am #21524What an interesting commentary…earwax has been a topic of discussion in our home…for a few years in fact…my brother and I used to have to go to the doctor to have it removed from our ears regularly…don’t mean to be gross here but it was so dry and sticky it came out like a ball of sap! My 5 children also have predominantly dry sticky excessive earwax too…the running joke in the house when I leave for the store is that I must be going to get Q tips….LOL In truth, I never knew that “wet” earwax even exhisted. As a footnote…we are not “sweaty” people either so perhaps ppl who have dry earwax are not sweatyish? Take care (or your ears too)~~~Laurie
May 23, 2006 at 1:37 am #21534Whites and Blacks have a stronger smell to their sweat than Asians and Native Americans due to the release of additional chemicals in their sweat, and much more sweat glands. It is speculated that the lower sweat production would benefit people subject to colder tempuratures. People with dry ear wax sweat less due to the genetic difference. The dry ear wax is described as grey and flaky.
I remember reading that either the Chinese or Japanese had a word or phrase about Europeans which meant, “stinking of butter.” Describing what they thought Europeans smelled like.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
