Tagged: adoptee
- This topic has 7 voices and 15 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #3625
I think this would be the appropriate place for this topic.
What do you all know about the Pee Dee People. Are they related to the Saponi, Catawba or any of the other local People? AND, are we related? I have asked this (?) on Powwows.com.
Any ideas or thoughts?
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31784Yes, it’s believed they were. They’re the people who occupied Town Creek Indian Mound, a great place to visit, especially during the pow wow held there annually.
I remember visiting it the same time I was reading about the Tutelo Spirit Adoption, which has been kept alive at Six Nations via Tutelo adoptees. It’s important that the door of the ceremonial house face the east, and the ceremony, which lasts all night, ends at dawn. Except . . . the dawn that the ceremony is built around is the dawn that occurs at a North Carolina latitude, not Canadian. The Canadians now observing the ritual open their east-facing door into the darkness. When I was at Town Creek it was pointed out that the doorway to the ceremonial lodge at the top of the mound faced the east. I realized that if the Spirit Adoption was held there, the timing would be right.
The Pee Dee were on the fringe of the Mound Culture (and Religion) so it’s uncertain if the Siouan we believe we are tied to, the Saponi/ Tutelo/ Monacan/ Occoneechee/ Eno/ Shakori et al were also involved in that religion, although there were mounds in Monacan territory along the Blue Ridge in VA. (Remember the mound Thoma Jefferson dug into, where Indian people were still stopping to grieve.)
There were elements of cultural stratification in the Mound cultures that don’t appeal to my own conceptions of an egalitarian tribal society, but it may just be my own vanity. These were rich, agricultural people, and rich, dense cultures do tend to stratify.
Another little detail I remember from the Town Creek museum. There were some very large earthenware vessels on display. They were used for infant burials. I thought, what a tender gesture, going to all that trouble to put an infant who’d just come from the womb back into a similar vessel.
Just google “Pee Dee Siouan” or “Town Creek Indian Mound”. There are a number of links, including at least part of the book by that name in pdf format.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pee_Dee_(tribe)
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31785James H. Merrell, The Indians’ New World (U. of NC Press, 1989) has a good bit about the Pedees (indexed with that spelling) — and anybody else that was kin to, allied with, or at war with the Catawbas. The sources are in many cases very obscure, and you find them in the copious footnotes. This book has more actual documentation of the relationships among the numerous Indian people of the piedmont area than any other that I’ve seen. (But not much of it is about the southern cult, etc. — other people have specialized in that.)
Sometime we should try to sort out the way the Saponi were “related” to the Catawbas. It looks to me as if they moved near them for protection or mutual defense, on two or three occasions — but were not really very friendly, and not much intermarried, even when they lived nearby. There are Catawba “census” lists and genealogies online, and they don’t look much like the corresponding source documents for Saponi descendants. Different family names, migration routes, enclaves, and so forth.
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31786Pappy, when I hear the term Pee Dee for some reason I think lower or southern North Carolina and into South Carolina. I do not recall where I was introduced to this term or tribe but that is my impression. Am I thinking correctly? Your post also seems to treat the PeeDee and the Catawba as the same tribe. Is that what you are saying ? I know so little about this group except familiar with the name but I have a large clay jar that is supposed to be Catawba. Ed
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31787I just googled Pee Dee and this link had some interesting information:
http://www.sciway.net/hist/indians/peedee.html
hope you can pull this up. ED
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31789Ed Yancey wrote: Your post also seems to treat the PeeDee and the Catawba as the same tribe. Is that what you are saying ?
Nope, not what I’m saying. Mainly, what I’m saying is that Merrell’s book is a good locator of sources that can help explain (to someone with a deep interest in these intertribal relationships) some of the ways in which the Pee Dees (not spelled that way in his book, though the river is) — and many other small tribes, Siouan and otherwise — became in some sense lumped together with the Catawbas, for the (often nefarious) purposes of the several colonial governments that had dealings with them.
If one were on the Yadkin and floated downstream long enough, one would be on the Pee Dee… that is, if it still has any current. (Mostly it’s a bunch of lakes, now.) What that may tell us about the Indians of the name, I’m not so sure. Seems to me they were mostly in SC, and were separate from the Catawbas, at least before about 1715 — but lived quite near them.
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31790My understanding is that the Catawba group of tribes had lived much longer in this area, the language is more distantly related to the other Siouan languages than the Saponi/Tutelo languages were. A theory I’ve favored is that the Saponi group had lived in he Ohio, were driven out around Medieval times by the Seneca, the same time those that became the Lakota/Dakota moved out west. The Dark Ages were a time of disruption, worldwide. The climate tanked. The way it may be doing now. . .
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31791Thanks for the clarification Pappy. I had time to do some searching and for the most part it seems the present bands connected with this tribe are all in South Carolina. I believe that link or another site gives a general land base to the coast of that state that was inhabited by them. On a site for the Pee Dee Indian Nation of Beaver Creek one statement identifies them as being Muskogeon. I just wanted to understand what or if their connection had been determined and apparently that band believes or has reason to say they are or were of the Muskogeon linquistic stock. Thanks again for your help. Ed
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31792This group is seeking Fed. Rec.. I understand that they made up of 5 groups. Is this a confederation such as the Iroquois?
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31793Where is this Beaver Creek located? I live next door to a Beaver Creek that was the location of a major archeological dig of a native american settlement.
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31794Jack, all I know is what I read from their site on internet. I believe all the groups are in South Carolina. There are maybe four or five groups that are affiliated with Pee Dee Native Americans but I don’t know if they have some connecting organization or not. I just gooled Pee Dee Native American and you should be able to find the various “bands” or groups. I don’t know why they are all in individual groups unless it is because of location. I know the Beaver Creek group identified itself as Muskogean. As Pappy stated that name Pee Dee is like so many of the early names and as far as that goes any identifying names that come out of early records. The spelling many times depends on the writer and how he or she “hears” it or is introduced to it. I juist enjoy the learning and searching . Ed
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31797Linda wrote: Yes, it’s believed they were. They’re the people who occupied Town Creek Indian Mound, a great place to visit
I think you described such a visit in a 2002 post about center seam moccasins that mentioned the “Saura woman.” Just now I was looking at a Town Creek page that was linked off a Pee Dee article posted today, I think by Ed Yancey. Anyway, this one:
http://www.nchistoricsites.org/town/pee-dee.htm
This page displays, in a cropped format, a “Pee Dee” female. Is it the Saura woman? Looks kind of like her, to me, though I haven’t gone back to check (and the easiest-to-find images of her are bronze statues). Anyway, this alleged Pee Dee lady is wearing a gorget with a symbol that would be familiar to the southern cult (Mississippian, mound builder, whatever), and also to present day (western) Siouan speakers.
In that regard, have y’all seen the movie “Hidalgo,” nominally about the career of an actual 19th century plains horse, that won an endurance race against various Arabians? Pretty good movie, kind of cheesy and exploitive at times, but well done within its genre. Catch it on cable TV. At the end of the race, Hidalgo’s rider carries a homemade banner with the symbol found on the Pee Dee lady’s gorget. Cosmic stuff, actually. Wish we understood it a little better. I’m not totally convinced the four points of the cross have to do with compass points — anyhow, the Saponi version only has three such points (but maybe there are fewer wind directions in North Carolina).
Having mentioned the Merrell book in this thread, I might as well also plug the recent museum catalog “Hero, Heart, and Open Hand: American Indian Art of the Ancient Midwest and South.” I think Techteach actually saw the exhibit, at the Art Institute of Chicago. It’s a beautiful picture book, but the greater value is in the excellent essays by specialists who come about as close as any of us moderns to understanding the Mississippian religion, cosmology and so on.
Occasionally we need these little reminders that our NC forebears weren’t all, or always, Baptists.
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31800The gorget that the woman is wearing is a medicine wheel, with the four (of 7) directions represented. This is the figure that is in the burial hut that has been recreated. If you check the Town Creek site, you will see the father as well. It is a very interesting place to visit….and the pow wow will be held in Sept.
http://www.nchistoricsites.org/town/Town.htm
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31801Mousini78 wrote: The gorget that the woman is wearing is a medicine wheel, with the four (of 7) directions represented.
Well, that’s one thing to call it — nowadays. But the original wearer had neither a compass nor the wheel, and none of us knows how many directions she may have perceived as useful. In many cultures, that’s a function of how many mountains you can see, or something equally site-specific. Anyway, it’s a symbol of something (probably, in some sense, the mythic universe), and it’s spiritually powerful.
Since I mentioned “Hidalgo,” I refreshed my memory of the movie via Wikipedia and its links. Found some reviews, good and bad (anywhere from one to five stars — people strongly liked or disliked it). Apparently it was not well received by the broader Native American community, if there is such a thing. Something about a white guy (either the writer of the screenlay, John Fusco, or his semi-historical model Frank Hopkins) using a largely faked or “wannabe” Native American identity, to make money. Unheard of — I’m shocked, shocked! Be that as it may, I personally got a kick out of the “medicine wheel” on his flag, at the end of the epic race.
Also, I got around to looking up the Saura woman, and she’s completely different from the Pee Dee woman. And is wearing a different kind of gorget. Both women are pretty cool, though.
June 24, 2008 at 4:37 am #31812Yes, Sara was found near the Dan River. The Pee Dee lady was, well, obviously, near the Pee Dee river. Not sure how far separated they were in time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
