[Sheree]

Okay guys…I have just about lost my mind here in Kentucky.

I was emailed last night by someone unrelated to my lines that said they have my great grandmother listed as Belle Angel and not Belle Turner. My grandmothers SS-5 says Turner so where do I look?

Any thoughts appreciated.

Sherry

[Bill Childs]

Sheree,

Well that’s interesting. Did they say what their source for that information was? (Actual document or their surmise?)

Bill

[Sheree]

Hello Bill,

It has been a long time…or so it seems. I asked the individual about her information and she said she had no idea why she had Belle listed as ANGEL. She also dosen’t know where she got that information.

Now, interestingly enough I was sent some information on my Sandlin/Shelton line that had a “lillie Belle” Turner listed in that information. However, when I merged the records I can no longer find her. Lillie Belle was an aka though. The closest found in the records I received is a Mahala Belle Turner and the approximate date of birth is a good 20 years after my Belles approximate date of birth. I “feel” like these Turners connect. Unless of course Belle was an ANGEL.

I try not to think about it too much. Oh, by the way, I ran across a post on the Bull surname about the Bulls of Knox County. It seems that a story is being passed that one of my descendants, “was well-known for telling fortunes w/ tea

> leaves and cards” Italian maybe? What do you think?

My DNA test results are due back on the 23 of January and I would like you to be one of the first to see the results. A small and yet strange way of showing my thanks. lol

Sherry

[Sheree]

LOL It is five o’clock in the morning. LOL I mean *ancestors not descendants. lol

Geesh, lol if you find my mind will you email it back? lol I need it.

Sherry

[Bill Childs]

Sherry,

If her SS-5 says she was a TURNER, then unless there are earlier documents proving her name was something else, you’d have to say that she is proven to be a TURNER.

Bill

[Author]

Posts