- This topic has 5 voices and 19 replies.
-
Posts
-
Anyone with information pertaining to this woman please let me know. She is my grandfathers grandmother on his fathers side. I can only find little information about her. She had first married David Willis which is my grandfathers grandfather, then a James F. Sword. I am interested in tracing her back as far as possible. She was believed to have been Native. According to family folk lore – David Willis was in the Civil War and found her and brought her home to raise her with his wife. When she was old enough he left his wife and married Nancy. One of there kids name was Logan Willis which is my grandfathers dad.
thanks
Charlie,
Some Fed. Census abstracts.
1920 Hancock Co., Tenn Census; ED98 Civil Dist. 4; 16 January; Sheet 7B; Household 108:
SWARD, Frank J.; Land Surveyor; m, W, 66 (?), Va, Va, Va.
………, NANCY J.; Wife; f, W, 45, Va, Va, Va.
………, LOGAN, son, 17, Tenn, Va, Va.
………, Bessie, dau, 14, Tenn, Va, Va.
………, Vernie, dau, 8, Tenn, Va, Va.
(on the 1930 Hancock Co Tenn census, Nancy “Neelie” (widowed) and her dau Vernie were living next door to David “Wallan”, 72, b.Tn. )
1910 Hancock Co., Tenn Census; ED96 Civil Dist 4; 27 April; Sheet 7A; Household 100: (Nancy and James’s listing are inverted by census taker, possibly to account for this being Nancy’s land and the children being hers. Nancy and James have been married less than a year and both were previously married.)
SWORD, NANCY J., wife, f, W, 36, m’d 2x, m’d 0 yrs; Va, Va, Va. 5 children/5 living.
………., James F., farm laborer, m, W, 37 (?), m’d 2x, m’d 0 yrs; Va, Va, Va.
WILLIS, Lilla; dau, 15, Va.
………, Mollie; dau, 12, Va.
………, Lou; dau, 10, Tenn.
………, LOGAN; son, 7, Tenn.
………, Bessie; dau, 4, Tenn.
1900 Hancock Co., Tenn Census; ED67 Civil Dist 4; 4 June; Sheet 2B: Household 32:
WILLIS, DAVID; Farming, W, m, Aug 1836, 63, m’d 7 yrs; Va, Va, Va.
………, NANCY J., wife, W, f, May 1876, 24, m’d 7 yrs; Va, Va, Va.
………, Lillie, dau, Nov 1894, 5; Va.
………, Mollie, dau, Aug 1896, 3, Va.
………, Lou A., dau, Jan 1900, 4 months old, Va.
Nancy was born nearly 11 years after the civil war ended and I think she was probably born in Hancock Co., Tenn, not Va.
1880 Hancock Co., Tenn Census/ ED89 4th Civil District; 1 June; p.1;
household 3:
WALLEN, David; W, m, 22, farmer, Tenn, Tenn, NC.
………., Mary A; W, f, 25, wife, Tenn, Tenn, Va.
………., Mariah; W, f, 1, dau, Tenn.
household 7:
WALLEN, Philip; W, m, 28, farmer, Tenn, Tenn, Va.
………., Elizabeth; W, f, 26, Sister, Tenn, Tenn, Va.
………., NANCY J.; W, f, 5, dau, Tenn, Tenn, Tenn.
………., Emmet; W, m, 1, Nephew, Tenn, Tenn, Tenn.
I haven’t found Philip’s wife’s name.
1860 & 1870 census records show Philip Wallen in the household of his probable parents:
Joseph R. Wallen, b.abt. 1825 Va, d. in 1860s, and
Susan/Susannah _?_, b.abt. 1825 Va (one lists her b.abt. 1835).
I haven’t checked this particular line further but most of the Wallens in S.W. Va area go back to Wallen/Walling Long Hunters who were in Pittsylvania Co., Va in the 1760s and moved to Montgomery/Washington/Russell Co., Va by the 1780s and on into the Lee Co., Va area.
Bill
Man Bill – you are good at what you do. Were the Long Hunters from Ft. Christianna? Were they considered Native, Mulatto, or Melungion?
Here is a post on longhunters with Wallen name:
Longhunters – Clinch, Holston, Wallen
——————————————————————————–
Found this and thought it would be of interest to most of us.
Subject: The Long Hunter-Pitts-Martin
The Long Hunter
The Long Hunter by Emory L. Hamilton, p. 29, The Mountain Empire Genealogical
Quarterly, Spring l984. The Long Hunter was peculiar to Southwest Va., only
and nowhere else on any frontier did such hunts ever originate. True, there
were hunters and groups of hunters on all frontiers in pioneer days, but they
were never organized and publicized as the long hunts which originated on the
Va. frontier. Most, if not all of the long hunts originated on the Holston in
the vicinity of present day Chilhowie, but were made up of hunters who lived
on both the Clinch and Holston rivers. The idea of this manuscript is to
prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these long hunters were native to the
area and were land owners, or residents along the waters of these two rivers.
Perhaps no group in history, who contributed so much to the knowledge of the
topography of our county, have been so nearly completely by-passed by
historians as have the long hunter of the late colonial days. In almost every
instance when the pioneer settler moved toward the extreme frontier, he had
long since been proceeded by the long hunter. When the first settlers were
arriving at Wolf Hills (Abingdon) and Cassell’s Woods in l768 and l769, the
long hunters had long ago by-passed these points and were then hunting far
away in the Ohio and Cumberland river basins of Ky. and western Tenn. Most of
the rivers and streams, gaps, salt licks, mountains and valleys had long ago
been named by these hunters. When the lst settlers arrived, they, in most
cases, adopted the names bestowed by the long hunters on natural land marks,
with very few changes, and we are still using most of them after a lapse of
nearly two centuries. Dr. Thomas Walker, on his trip to the Ohio, entered in
his Journal on April 9, l750, this statement: “We traveled to a river, which
I supposed to be that which hunters call Clinch’s river, from on Clinch a
hunter who first found it.” This entry was made almost twenty years before a
settlement was made on the Clinch River and leaves little doubt as to how the
river got its name. In the annals of American history there is no braver lot
than these early hunters. Not only did they endure the rigorous winters in
crude shelters, but the danger of sickness, privation, exposure, hunting
accidents, and the very real and ever present danger of being scalped by the
Indians. They were especially disliked by the Indians, being looked upon as
robbers of their hunting grounds, which they truly were, and also, as
forerunners of the ever-spreading, land-clearing, soil-tilling settler. Just
why was this particular group of men given to hunting, instead of tilling the
soil as most settlers? Perhaps there are three answers to this question;
first, the spirit of adventure born in some people which they are unable to
quell, among whom were James Dysart and Castleton Brooks who were quite
well-to-do, as well as Colonel James Knox, who is referred to as the leader
of the long hunters and who later became very wealthy. Secondly, there were
those who enjoyed, above all else, the spirit of the hunt, among whom were
Elisha Wallen, William Carr, Isaac Bledsoe, and others, who, all their lives
were hunters and nothing but hunters. The last answer, but certainly not the
least, was the profit derived from these hunts. it was not uncommon for a h
unter to realize sixteen to seventeen hundred dollars for his season’s take,
and this was far in excess of what he could earn in almost any other
lucrative endeavor. The hides and pelts were sold along the coast, where
animals were not longer plentiful, and in England, for making leather,
especially buffalo skins. The British market was lost at the outbreak of the
Rev. War and the long hunts were never again pursued after the Rev. War
began. The long hunter today would be called a scientist, naturalist,
explorer, or some other high-sounding name, for he had to be master of many
arts. He knew the sky and what a sunset foretold; he knew the wind and could
tell it by smell, as to weather dry or moist, and could wet his finger with
spittle and tell in which direction it was blowing. He could, in numerous
ways, tell the seasons, predict the weather, and by the stars he could tell
the time and direction. He knew the plants and where they grew, and by
feeling the moss and shaggy bark of a tree, determine the north and find his
direction by night. He knew the medicinal properties of plants and how to
treat his wounds and ailments there from. He knew his rifle, how to use it,
repair it, and even in some instances how to make one. He knew the use of the
hunting and skinning knife, the tomahawk, and other tools and weapons of the
hunt and the kill, which was often times the kill of an Indian whose skill
and cunning he was forced to match and outwit in order to survive. He was
aware of , and knew the habits and animals and birds and was able to
distinguish the true call of such from the imitation by an Indian. He
received his training from masters of natural history to survive. The very
toys of his childhood were imitations of his future life. The long hunters
usually went out in Oct. and returned the latter part of March, or early in
April. Their winter’s take consisted of both fur pelts and hides, especially
the hides of buffalo which were want only slaughtered for the hides only, the
carcass left to be devoured by animals and vultures. There are recorded
events where hundreds and, a few times, where thousands were slain, and
certainly the Indian was justified in his feelings that his hunting grounds
were being robbed. The best descriptions of the long hunters have been left
to us by John Reed, who knew many of them intimately, both in his native
Pittsylvania Co., and also in Powell Valley when he came to Martin’s station
in l775. According to Reed, the long hunters seldom hunted in parties larger
than two or three men. their reasons for this were two-fold: first, larger
parties were more apt to scare game away, and secondly, the Indians were less
likely to become suspicious of a small group robbing their hunting grounds,
not to mention that smaller parties were less likely to be discovered by the
Indians. Redd tells a very interesting story about Powell Valley that was
related to him by the long Hunter, William Carr. “Twelve miles south of
Martin’s Station on Powell River, there was a very rich piece of bottom land
call “rob Camp”. In this there was the remains of an old hunting camp from
which the land took its name. Some five years before Martin’s Station was
settled (Martin first came to Lee county in l769, explored the valley, but
stayed only a few days. He returned in l775 and established his Station,
hence the referred to event must have taken place in l770), three men, with
two horses each, and with their traps, guns and other necessary equipment for
a long hunt, settled down in the bottom above alluded to; built a camp and
spent the fall, winter and part of the spring there in hunting.” At that time
peace existed between the whites and Indians. These hunters were very succe
ssful in killing game and lived in perfect harmony with the Indians, who
frequently visited the hunters and congratulated them upon their success in
taking game. This intimacy continued until the spring, at which time, the
hunters concluded that they had as much fur and skins as they could
conveniently carry home. Accordingly, they commenced packing loaded their
horses and were in the act of setting off for home, with the earnings of
their successful hunt, when twelve or fifteen Indians came up, took
possession of their horses, furs, guns, and in fact all the hunters had, and
in exchange gave them three of their old guns, and told the hunters that the
land they were hunting on belonged to the Indians, and also the game, that
they would spare their lives that time, but cautioned them never to return.
Reed tells of another interesting camp he saw in Powell Valley. He states: ”
I was b. on the 25th day of Oct. l755. In Jan. l775, when we were on our way
out to settle Martin’s Station in Powell’s valley, in going down Wallen’s
Creek, near its junction with Powell river, where the hills closed in very
near the creek, was found the remains of an old hunting camp, and in front of
the camp the bones of two men were lying bleached. they were said to be the
bones of two men who went out hunting in the fall of l773 and never returned.
their names I have forgotten. In another letter to Dr. Lyman C. Draper, Redd
has this to say in his answer to a query made by Draper: “The remains of the
camp I saw in Powell Valley were on its north side; and as well as my memory
serves me, were within forty or fifty yards of the mouth of Wallen’s creek at
the ford of Powell/s river. The camp was built beside a large limestone rock
which served for the back of the camp. The names of the persons whose bones I
saw there I should be unable to accurately distinguish were I to hear them.
to be cont.
Janette
continued…
This may be possibly the camp pitched by Bonne’s war party. The bones I saw
were not known certainly to be those of the two long hunters having gone on a
long hunt in Powell Valley in l773, who had not returned. The camp was eight
or ten miles from Martin’s Station. Redd’s reference to “Boone’s war party”
must be a reference to the spot where Daniel Boone’s party camped in l773 to
await the party coming to join them from Castlewood, which was ambushed and
massacred near the head of Wallen’s Creek on Oct. l0, l773. the location
described by Redd also fits the general location of Elisha Wallen’s hunting
camp of l76l. Redd says the long hunters set out with two pack horses each a
large supply of powder and lead, a small hand vise and bellows, a screwplate
and files for repairing their rifles, and while he makes no mention of it,
they also carried a supply of flour and bread. In fact, on the way out they
could carry quite a lot of supplies as each hunter had two pack horses. The
long hunters went out together in large parties, built a station camp, then
fanned out in twos and threes to range and hunt over large areas. The first
known station camp established in Powell’s Valley was that of Elisha Wallen
in l76l. It is thought his party consisted of eighteen or nineteen men, but
since no list has been preserved, only the names of a very few are known
certainly to have been in the party. Wallen’s station camp, set up at the
mouth of Wallen’s Creek, was probably like other station camps, built of
poles, sometime only eight-ten feet, covered with puncheions or bark, walls
on three sides the front open, along which a fire was built for warmth.
Upright poles were set up—often a forked pole was driven into the ground,
with a cross pole on which the bark or pucheons were laid, sloping toward the
back in order to drain melting snow or rain away from the fire. This type of
shelter was known as “Half-faced” camps. Other times an extra large
already-fallen tree or large rock was used for the backwall of such a camp
shelter. Some of Wallen’s party are said to have seen the eleven-year-old
carving of the name of Powell and so named the valley, river and mountain.
Ambrose Powell had been a member of Dr. Thomas Walker’s exploring party of
l750. Redd says that when he knew Wallen on Smith’s river in Pittsylvania Co.
in l774, he was then some forty years old and had been a long hunter for many
years before. that he usually hunted on a range of mountains lying on the
east of Powells’ Valley and from Wallen to the mountain took its name. Wallen
described the ridge and surrounding country on which he hunted as abounding
in almost every known specie of game. The animals and birds had been intruded
on so seldom that they did not fear his presence, but rather regarded him as
a benefactor, but soon learned to flee from his presence. Wallen, along with
Blevins and Coaxes, who were connected by marriage, lived on Smith’s river in
Pittsylvania Co. in l774. they owned no land, but were squatters. During the
Rev. War, the Va. Legislature passes a law that British subjects who owned
land must come in and take the oath of allegiance or their lands would be
confiscated. Redd says that some in Pittsylvania Co. did this, and Wallen,
the Blevinses and Coxes, packed up “enmass” and moved to the frontier for
fear they would have to pay many years back rent as squatters. He states that
the Blevins and Cox families settled on Holston River, above Long Island,,
(now Kingport) and that Wallen settled on the Holston about eighteen miles
above Knoxville, and that in l776 he stopped by to see him, and was informed
by Wallen’s wife that he had then been on a hunt for two months. Redd further
states that Wallen later moved to Powell Valley, lived there a short time and
then moved to Mo. Redd’s statement of Wallen’s movements is borne out by a
letter written to Dr. Draper by F.A. Wallen, a nephew to Elisha, from
Fairlan, Livingston Co., Mo., dated Oct. l5, l853, in which he says: “He
(Elisha) moved from Va. to Tenn. thence to Ky., thence to Washington Co. Mo.
at a very early date.” That Elisha Wallen lived for sometime in Powell
Valley, near Martin’s Station is further proven by a letter to Col. William
Martin, son of Gen. Joseph Martin who built Martin’s Station. This letter is
dated Dixon Springs, (Tenn.) 7 July l842, and is also to Dr. Draper. In the
letter William Martin tells of going on hunting trips with Wallen who lived
near his father’s station in Powell Valley. He said Wallen told him of going
back and forth to Pittsylvania Co. where he lived, of his helping col.
(William) Byrd establish fort Chiswell (l76l) of being at fort Loudon, and of
building a fort at Long Island of Houston. Col. Martin says that he was
intimately acquainted with Wallen in his latter days. The time col. Martin
knew Wallen was in l785 and thereafter, as he did not come out to his
father’s station in Powell Valley until l785. In Wallen’s party of l76l, some
were known to hunt as fart away as the Cumberland river in western Tenn.
Among those known to have been in this party, besides Wallen, there was his
father-in-law Jack Blevins, his brother-in-law, William Blevins, Charles Cox,
William Newman, William Pitman, Henry Scaggs, Uriah Stone, Michael Stoner;
James Harrod and William Carr. At this time, William Pittman was in his early
twenties, six feet tall and of fine appearance. There were several Pittmans
and more than one named William. Of this William Pittman, John Redd says; “In
the latter part of Feb.l776, Pittman and Scaggs came to Martin’s Station in
Powell Valley. They were returning from a long hunt they had taken in the
“Brush” on the northwest side of Cumberland Mountain. They returned earlier
than usual and their reason for doing so was that they had seen a great smoke
some distance off which they knew was Indian “ring-hunting”, and besides,
they had seen Indian tracks through the woods, where they were hunting;
whereupon they set out for home. They spent some eight to ten days at the
Station. While they were with us, they showed some silver ore they had found
on top of a little hill in their hunting ground. They said that while they
were hunting, a snow fell some twelve to eighteen inches deep. Scaggs and
Pittman went out through the snow to kill some game. after going a short
distance from their camp, they discovered that on top of a certain hill,
there was no snow, while all the surrounding hills were covered with it. This
led them to go upon the hill and see the cause of its not being covered with
snow like the rest. On arriving at the summit of the hill, they discovered
that it was covered with a very heavy kind of ore. Each of them put some of
the ore in their shot bag and returned to camp.” “When they arrived at the
camp, they took some of the ore, and by means of their hand bellows and some
thick oak bark, it was melted and they found it to be silver ore. They
brought it back with them to Martin’s Station—the silver they had extracted
and some of the ore. The silver was pronounced by all who saw it to be very
pure.” “Scaggs & Pittman were said to be men of a very high sense of honor
and very great truth. By the next fall the war with the Indians broke out and
they went no more on their long hunts.” He further states that in l776 Scaggs
and Pittman lived on New river. In Washington Co., Va., Land Entry Book I, p.
86, dated Nov. 8, l782, I find where William Pittman once owned the land on
sugar Hill, overlooking St. Paul. Va. This is the land upon which John
English settled in l772, where his wife and children were killed by Indians
in l787, and which he sold to the Bench Baron Pierre De Tubeuf in l79l, and
the site where the Baron was murdered in l795. The land had changed hands
many times by assignment of warrant before the Baron bought it. English
obtained it from Henry Hamlin who had obtained it from Joseph Drake, another
long hunter, and Drake had gotten it from William Pittman, who in turn had
received it from Thomas Pittman and Joseph Drake. Just what relation Thomas
was to the long hunter, William Pittman, is unknown. Henry Scaggs left the
area and moved on into Ky., dying on Pittman’s Creek in Taylor Co., Ky.,
about l808 or l809, upwards of 80 years old. Collins, in his “History of
Ky.”, says: “He was six feet tall, dark skinned, bony, bold, enterprising and
fearless. He and his brother (Perhaps Charles) were noted hunters, and
nothing but hunters. It was from Scaggs that Scaggs Creek in Rockcastle Co.,
Ky., got its name. In l779 Henry Scaggs wads living on the Clinch in Tenn.
rockhound
View Public Profile
Send a private message to rockhound
Send email to rockhound
Find all posts by rockhound
Add rockhound to Your Buddy List
#3 08-13-2006, 09:58 PM
Henry Hamlin is related to me so in your search if you find more on him please let me know under Hamlin/Hamblen Indians??? genealogy forum here: Also william Carr… not sure if related but the hamlin/Hamblen Carr family have many many innermarriages til this day.
goiod Lluck,
Janette
thanks Janette
Charlie,
David Willis’s first wife was Susan WALLEN, b.abt. 1836 Hawkins Co., Tn; d. 14 Aug 1893 Hancock Co., Tn. David then married abt. 1893, Nancy J.
Susan was the dau of James F. Wallen and Margaret “Peggy” Robinson.
James F. Wallen was a descendant of Elisha Wallen, Long Hunter.
Philip Wallen, the presumed father of Nancy J. Wallen, is also a descendant of this same family line – details later.
Bill
I was speaking to my grandfather last night and he said that his grandfather “David” found Nancy Jane in the woods and brought her home to raise with him and his wife. Then he ended up divorcing his wife and marrying Nancy Jane. Nancy Jane and David had child named Logan Willis ( my grandpas dad). Nancy Jane also married a sword after David’s death. I have pictures of her, hopefully when my wife wakes up she can figure out why the scanner is not working and I can post pics. Thanks for all your help Bill.
Wow, Janette. That is a lot of info! Some of that appears to have taken place in the area where I grew up. I went to John Redd Smith elemetary school, in Collinsville. The history y’all are sharing about the area is much more interesting that what was in our textbooks! ;~)
Something to note (assuming I have my facts straight) is that the Smith River apparently “moved” when western Pittsylvania County became Henry County.
I have just viewed a Wallen/Walling web page and I did not see Nancy Jane or her parents on the family tree. The family tree dates as far back as 1590 up to 1951 and Philip, his wife Lucy Jane or Nancy Jane exist on the family tree.
However – they do have the other Wallen family’s on there tree including the “Longhunters” mentioned above.
Thanks, Charlie.
Looks like Smith River Elisha’s son John would be a good place for me to start my search, as a John provided the surety for Mary’s marriage.
Does anyone know whether the surname WALDEN is related to the surname Whalen & it’s derivatives?
In the info I just found (written by the Haithcoks), Walden shows up on their list of Indian families in Patrick Co., VA.
Bee – Walden is another possible spelling variation, along with Whalen.
Charlie –
The family tree in the above link follows the line of another son of James Carr Wallen & Mary Johnson.
Joseph R. Wallen, b. 5 June 1826 Hawkins Co., Tenn is the son of the John J. Wallen, listed in the above link in the “Fifth Generation”.
John J. Wallen, b. 30 Dec 1794 Hawkins Co., Tenn; d. 27 Oct 1845 Hancock Co., Tenn; marr’d 7 Mar 1813 Hawkins Co., Tenn, Elizabeth Wallen (likely a cousin), b. 1 Feb 1792 Hawkins Co., Tenn; d. after 1852. Elizabeth Wallen is listed in trees as the dau of Elisha, b. 1732, and Catherine Blevins, b. 1738, but that would make Catherine 54 yrs old in 1792 so Elizabeth wouldn’t seem likely to be their dau, or the dates for Catherine Blevins Wallen may be incorrect.
Abstracted Census Info:
1850 Lee Co., Va Census; District 31; 1 Aug; p.33;
Household 238:
Joseph Wallen, 22, m, W, farmer, $0, Tenn
Susan………., 24, f, W, Va
Ruth…………, 2, f, W, Va
……………………………………………..
1860 Hancock Co., Tn Census; Wallen District, P.O. War Gap; 21 July; p.121; Household 800:
Joseph R Wallen, 35, m, W, farm laborer, $0, $40, Tenn.
Susannah…….., 35, f, W, Tenn. (elsewhere as “Susan”)
Ruth……………, 13, f, W, Tenn
PHILIP…………., 12, m, W, Tenn
George…………., 8, m, W, Tenn
Elisabeth………., 3, f, W, Tenn.
Household 801: (family of the Susan/Susannah who marr’d David Willis. 1850 Hancock census, p.44, lists Susan in their household)
James F. Wallen, 49, m, W, farming, $1500, $600, Tenn
Margaret………, 48, f, W, Va
Martha……….., 21, f, W, Tenn
Malvina………., 19, f, W, Tenn
Alfred…………, 16, m, W, Tenn
Polly………….., 14, f, W, Tenn
Andy…………., 12, m, W, Tenn
Margaret…….., 10, f, W, Tenn
Hannah…………, 9, f, W, Tenn
Causby An…….., 7, f, W, Tenn (elsewhere as “Cosby Ann”)
Household 802:
DAVID WILLIS, 22, m, W, farming $0, $75, Va.
SUSAN………., 22, f, W, Tenn (nee: Wallen)
Manda……….., 4, f, W, Tenn
Thurman…….., 2, m, W, Tenn
Rosy An………, 4 months, f, W, Tenn
………………………………………………..
1870 Hancock Co., Tenn Census; Civil District 4; 28 June; p.12;
Household 70:
WILLIS, DAVID, 33, m, W, farmer, $300, $100, Va.
………, SUSAN, 32, f, W, Tenn
………, Amanda, 15, f, W, Tenn
………, Rosa, 12, f, W, Tenn
………, Andrew, 9, m, W, Tenn
………, Julia, 7, f, W, Tenn
………, Henry, 2, m, W, Tenn
Household 59:
WALLEN, Susan, 35, f, W, keeping house, $0, $0, Va. (age should be abt. 45)
………., PHILLIP, 18, m, W, Farming, Va.
………., George, 17, m, W, Va.
………., Elizabeth, 15, f, W, Va.
………., Delaney, 8, f, W, Tenn
………………………………………………..
1880 Scott Co., Va Census; ED80 Powell District; 9 June; p.14B;
Household 127:
WILLIS, DAVID, W, m, 40, farmer, Va, Va, – .
………, Susan, W, f, 45, wife, Tenn, Tenn, Va
………, Rosa, W, f, 20, dau, Tenn
………, Andrew, W, f, 18, son, Tenn
………, Julia, W, f, 14, dau, Tenn
………, Henry, W, m, 12, son, Tenn
………, Mary, W, f, 11, dau, Tenn
………, George, W, m, 8, son, Tenn
HAYES, Louisa, W, f, 15, Servant, Va, Va, Va.
….
Bill
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
