- This topic has 9 voices and 26 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #3855
Again I have been researching the mix of Powhatan and Sioux Native Americans in the Jamestown VA area. It seems there are records that Chief Powhatan was related to two groups. The Aztecs of Mexico and the Crow of Montana.
This is why I believe the story that Sacajawea’s brother was Chief of the Crow in 1804 is true.
If you read the stories of Chief Powhanan, you will see he and his tribe did not get along with the Sioux in Virginia. That he pushed them into what is now the Maryland area. You must correct me if I am wrong but I believe these same issues presented themselves in the Dakotas in the later 1800’s
I believe you have to look at Chief Hanging Maw and his relationship to the Virginia Dandridge family and to Alexander Spotswood and his friend Daniel Boone to understand the Native American Mix. Another interesting area was the marriage of Big Jake Troxell into the Cherokee Tribe and his involvement with well known Virginia/Maryland Jewish Native American fur traders.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34030I guess what I am trying to say is yes, that could have happened if you look at all the mixed blood of the Cherokee of the 1790’s I am not even sure Cherokee Chief Hanging Maw was Cherokee although his wife Betty Carpenter sure was. She was the direct line of Moytoy of Talco. After Chief Hanging Maw died, Chief John Ross was elected as a replacement. I believe John Ross was only 1/8 Native American blood. Most of his family was from Ireland. Chief John Ross was elected American style. I am not sure he needed any Native American blood to run for Chief. He just had to be on the ticket.
After the American Revolution, Blood Lines were looked down on. The American idea was everyone was elected on their own ideas and platform and why not, everyone was equal.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34031Begging your pardon, but John Ross’s father was Scottish. Since his mother was Cherokee, so was he.
Sue, yes it is possible. Tribal affiliation is just that…affiliation. Who they were with. Take a look at the names of the tribes that were counted. Others were lumped in with them. Yuchi were counted as Creek. Very possible for Saponi to be counted as Cherokee, since they sometimes lived together.
Best wishes in your search.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34040I also have to beg your pardon. It is my understanding that Chief John Ross was Irish, 1/8 Native American and elected as Chief. If you have records otherwise, I would like to be pointed in the direction where I might find them.
It could very well be that John Ross was Scotch Irish and he might be 1/4 Native American vs 1/8. I do not believe Chief John Ross’ mother was 100% Native American.
I do know he took over from Chief Hanging Maw and Chief Hanging Maw does not appear to be Cherokee but rather Mingo.
My big interest in Chief Hanging Maw was the indident with Daniel Boone’s daughter. I believe this incident is connected to James Fenimore Cooper, his friend Ned Myers and a fellow named Chief John Logan.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34041Boy.. Poor John Ross, he’s really getting a workout here. Just to get my Scots Irish two cents in, I will offer a little history I have found in the search for roots.
Originally the Scots were thrown out of the highlands by the English ( gotta love those English) because the space was needed for sheep, and were displaced to Northern Ireland where they became the Scots Irish (Ulstermen or Orangemen). They arrived there just in time for the potato famine in Ireland. Poor and starving, many of them got onto coffin ships bound for America. Many of these coffin ships landed in Philadelphia. The poor survivors basically headed for the hills and ended up in Appalachia. That is where the folks (my folks) got to know the local indigenous people, and began to intermarry. Ross is a known Scottish surname. I hope this information might help someone in their search.
Best to all Threecrows
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34043I am not sure why Chief John Ross was mostly Irish. In any event, has anyone read the letters from Chief John Ross to his I believe neighbor Jacob Myers. Do you know if the Ross family connects to William of Orange in any way or have any connection to the Claypole/Ross family of Betsy Ross?
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34044John Ross was born in 1790. Hanging Maw was dead by 1794. John Ross was NOT Hanging Maw’s direct successor. hint: do the math. In fact, John Ross wasn’t chief until 1828, 30 some odd years after Hanging Maw died.
John Ross’s father was an immigrant from Scotland. The records of that period are very clear about this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ross_(Cherokee_chief)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging_Maw
The Scots-Irish, aka Ulster Scots, were mostly NOT from the Scottish Highlands. Rather, the majority hailed from the English-Scottish borders region, other parts of lowland Scotland and northern England, with some Welsh and French Protestants thrown in for good measure. George MacDonald Frser’s book “Steel Bonnets” touches on this, as do many articles available on the internet, as do many books available at your local library and bookstore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Scots_people
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34045The author of “Steel Bonnets” should read as “George MacDonald Fraser”, not “Frser”.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34046I am willing to believe Chief John Ross was not the direct successor to Hanging Maw if you have the name of who was the direct successor. I don’t believe you can say Little Turkey was his successor as he was already a Chief of another split Cherokee tribe. It would be like saying Jefferson Davis would be the successor of Abraham Lincoln if Abraham Lincoln died in 1862. Although maybe that could have happened.
In other words if Hanging Maw was Chief up until it death in 1794 and John Ross wasn’t Cheif until 1828, then who was Chief of the people following Hanging Maw between 1794 and 1828?
So yes it’s EZ to do the Math and the Math says someone is missing. If John Ross’s family was from Ulster then indeed John Ross’s family was from Ireland although he could be Scottish or Scots/Irish. For sure John Ross’s family was mostly NOT Native American. In any event, it does not change the story that John Ross was Chief.
I do not believe he was more then 1/4 Native American or less then 1/8 Native American.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34047Sources for Daniel Ross being Scottish are numerous. He was from Sutherlandshire. Quick google search should yield results. His mother’s side (MacDonald) is where it gets confusing. Have seen them listed as British interpreters, Scottish, and Irish by various people.
However, his mother was Cherokee because her mother was Cherokee, and so forth. We did not measure ourselves with fractions back then. Many Cherokee still do not do this.
Not sure how this relates to Saponi?
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34048The heading is, Saponi listed as Cherokee. It could also read Scotch Irish listed as Cherokee. This issue is, could Saponi be listed as Cherokee? The answer has to be yes if indeed, Scotich Irish could also be listed as Cherokee.
If indeed John Ross’ mother was Cherokee and Irish, he could just as EZ be Irish as he could be Cherokee. It depends on your point of view.
I am just as right saying John Ross was Irish as someone else saying John Ross was Cherokee if the mother controls the blood line.
That is my same point with Sacajawea’s grandchildren by John Baptiste being named Barbara and Margaret Myers.
So that is how it relates.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34049aagghh….
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34050Strange but true. Just exactly who controls the blood line and why? Although, the true American way is that anyone should be able to run for Cherokee Chief as long as he or she has the votes.
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34051Aaaaggghhh..
July 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm #34090Larry, where do I go to find that information. i’ve been reading what I can find on the Internet about Powhatan. But a lot of what is on the Internet is not factual. And, the majority of the “Bollings information/genealogy” was destroyed in the early years.
On top of that, Wyndham Robertson who wrote a book on the Bollings and I assume Rolfe’s too, Robertson admits he made up the name Jane Poythress, in order to clear up the confusion at that time. That time period was the late 1800’s, not colonial times. So, if Jane Poythress didn’t exist, who was Thomas Rolfe’s first wife? They still have her listed as Thomas’ wife. Another controversy is: did John Rolfe marry Elizabeth Washington, in England, or was it Thomas Rofle who first marred Elizabeth Washington in England. Whch ever one it was, they had a daughter Ann(e) who married Peter Elwin. It is my opinion that the Bollings have the same problem as everyone else. We all, have several ancestors that we can’t place.
Carolyn…….tenderfoot1954@yahoo.com
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
